Friday, March 12, 2010
Is Behavorial Targeting Outmoded?
Much of marketing is language. Marketing to marketers is also very much a question of language. For instance, look at today’s New York Times piece on real-time bidding for online ad placements.
The article gives this example of the process:
“Say a man just searched for golf clubs on eBay (which has been testing a system from a company called AppNexus for more than a year). EBay can essentially follow that person’s activities in real time, deciding when and where to show him near-personalized ads for golf clubs throughout the Web.”
In fact, the method of personalizing ads based on user activity has not really been, as the article’s lead puts it, “largely missing until recently.” Instead, the term more commonly used for such real-time ad personalization has been “behavioral targeting.”
However, it’s fascinating the way the Times article refrains from using the word “behavioral.” That absence is in sync with how some people in the online ad industry are also looking to move away from the term behavioral targeting. They have two key reasons:
- One, behavioral targeting pushes privacy hot buttons among concerned advocacy groups, the FTC and Congress, and a fair share of Internet users.
No wonder then that Google execs are quoted prominently in the article, because while they don’t want to be associated with behavioral targeting, real-time advertising is exactly what search is. Therefore translating the same real-time targeting concept to display—as Google looks to ramp up its revenues for such advertising—is a better fit for the company, at least linguistically.
- Two, the use of data to target ads in real-time, based on audience behavior, is becoming ever more sophisticated in the details used for targeting. For example, as The Times article notes, “One factor is the site the person is visiting: Is this a site that has performed well for eBay? Is the spot where the ad would run an attractive one, or downpage where someone might miss it? Another is how many ads the person has seen recently.”
So maybe behavioral targeting is outmoded. Even if the technique is still alive, all the potential negative issues attached to “behavioral” increasingly make the term itself poor marketing.
Whatever you call it, US spending on display ads that use audience activity for targeting will grow by 21.6% this year, passing the $1 billion mark.

For more on the topic, see my recent report, Audience Ad Targeting: Data and Privacy Issues.








Social comments and analytics for this post…
This post was mentioned on Twitter by kelvin8048: Is Behavorial Targeting Outmoded? http://bit.ly/dsLP4M...
Behavioral Targeting is not outmoded. Outmoded means: not being in style and no longer being acceptable, current or usable. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/outmoded
Not being in style? Behavioral Targeting is in style. In online advertising style: “US spending on display ads that use audience activity for targeting will grow by 21.6% this year.” Behavioral Targeting’s in style to me.
Not being acceptable, current or usable?
“US spending on display ads that use audience activity for targeting will grow by 21.6% this year, passing the $1 billion mark.” Yea, I’d say behavioral targeting is current, and usable/being used.
Although, “behavioral targeting pushes privacy hot buttons among concerned advocacy groups, the FTC and Congress, and a fair share of Internet users,” it’s still acceptable to use behavioral targeting, it’s not banned. However, perhaps the perceived notion of behavioral targeting is not accepted.
Only if the FTC and Congress crack down on behavioral targeting do I see behavioral targeting becoming outmoded. Overall, I disagree. With increased database marketing, I see behavioral targeting being used more.
@Josh Schwatz:
Yes, I could have been clearer, when I wrote: “Even if the technique is still alive, all the potential negative issues attached to ‘behavioral’ increasingly make the term itself poor marketing.”
As the whole posting indicated, language is a big part of it.
So, not that the actual use of BT is outmoded — as you write — but the term “behavioral targeting” increasingly seems to be.
And marketing depends on language, even the marketing of marketing.
I agree. Behavioral Targeting, as a term, is “outmoded” and potentially offensive depending on who you present it to.
Although tracking search behavior may be acceptable to us in marketing, the term can seem bit too “big brother-ish” for the average online shopper – or even a potential ad buyer – to appreciate without having privacy concerns. I believe “Real Time Targeting”, as David Hollarman wrote, is a much more fitting term. And, it appeals to what all Online ad buyers want, real time results.
Thanks David. I’m replacing BT with RTT in my sales pitch starting now!
[...] his piece Is Behavioral Targeting Outmoded?, Hallerman examines what might be yet another industry evolution, more in jargon than in underlying [...]
[...] [...]
you can see that there is a massive growth in online advertising these days, google paved the way on ppc `”:
Hey
finaly I found what I was looking for
how did you guys found this information??thank you for your article I saw it on Google And I saved it .I like. You have my email guys, so can you please send me an email when you post some new blogs on your site!!!
thank you and have a nice day
The heart of your writing whilst appearing agreeable initially, did not really work properly with me personally after some time. Someplace throughout the paragraphs you actually were able to make me a believer but only for a short while. I nevertheless have a problem with your jumps in assumptions and one might do well to fill in those breaks. In the event you actually can accomplish that, I will definitely end up being amazed.
Whoa! Thank you so much! I always aspired to create in my website something like that.